By David E. Worley
T
he arbitrator in Osceola County, 131 LA 226 (Smith 2012) reinstated the highest ranked firefighter at a demonstration where another firefighter, the “engineer” broke from procedure in operating the boom ladder and accidentally caused serious injury to another firefighter. There was insufficient evidence to support the County’s position that the grievant had neglected his duties causing the injury of the other officer. [Read more…]
By David E. Worley
Loose lips sink ships, and the Wright County Sherriff’s Office wants their ship water-tight. In Wright County, 131 LA 410 (Befort, 2012), the termination of a Sherriff’s deputy who divulged law-enforcement information to her cousin and then clearly lied to investigators was firmly upheld. The arbitrator here also made a finding concerning the admissibility of the evidence proving the grievant had actually divulged the information in question, finding although the evidence was improperly obtained, it was done so by a private citizen and is therefore admissible and not barred by the 4th amendment.
By David E. Worley
In Carroll v. Clifford Township, 34 IER Cases 1118 (M. D. Pa. 2012), summary judgment was denied when the plaintiff, the former sheriff, had his position eliminated, his department budget reduced, and was denied entry into the Fraternal Order of Police after filing a lawsuit against the township and subsequently filing an earlier retaliation lawsuit.
By David E. Worley
In City of Crystal (131 LA 268 (Neigh, 2012)), the arbitrator determined that the City and the Union were bound by the contract language and its plain interpretation in regard to the required contribution of the City to employee’s health insurance as well as contributions to the employee’s Health Savings Accounts. The dispute arose in an unusual context in which premiums decreased after the expiration of the CBA and the City had to determine how to administer the benefit, which was reduced in its cost.
By David E. Worley
In Smith v. City of New Smyrna Beach (116 FEP Cases 1973 (M.D. Fla. 2012)) a female firefighter’s alleged facts on claims of sex discrimination and retaliation were sufficient to survive summary judgment when she was suspended for using profane language. Using such language was common in the workplace and no one else had received a suspension. Additionally, a hostile work environment may exist. Taken in a light most favorable to the Plaintiff, the court concluded, the facts were sufficient so that a jury might find the Plaintiff was treated adversely because of her gender.
By Jim Cline
We are following other Labor and Employment Law Blogs on the Web and will bring to your attention some articles worth reading. Here are some other articles we think are worth a look:
By David E. Worley
In Phillips v. Marion County Sheriff’s Office (194 LRRM 2389 (9th Cir. 2012)), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a Corrections Officer has a constitutionally protected property interest in their employment once a final and binding reinstatement order has been issued. The Ninth Circuit stated that the property interest extends beyond the employment itself to the reinstatement of employment as well. The Marion County Sheriff’s Association (in Salem, Oregon), was successful in having a discharged deputy ordered reinstated in a “final and binding” arbitration decision. The County refused to abide by the arbitration decision, making the argument that public policy did not approve of the mistreatment of inmates, the misconduct the plaintiff was accused of. [Read more…]
By David E. Worley
In Municipality of Penn Hills (131 LA 114), a 30-year EMT argued that his five-day suspension was unnecessarily harsh. The result was the reduction of the five day suspension to a one-day suspension when the arbitrator found that the intention of the greivant was to protect the life of a child. Although the employee violated two known protocols, the arbitrator concluded that the surrounding facts mitigated the severity of the violation, and thus only a minimal punishment was warranted. [Read more…]
By David E. Worley
In Wardia v. Justice & Pub. Safety Cabinet Dep’t of Juvenile Justice, (27 AD Case 385 (6th Cir. 2013), the Sixth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals granted summary judgment on a failure to accommodate claim of a former juvenile detention worker who was physically unable to perform a restraint on an inmate. Because the ability to physically restrain, while rarely used, is an essential function of the job, the plaintiff’s request to have other more physically capable employees perform restrains, the court ruled, was unreasonable. Further, the plaintiff’s request to be put on a light duty monitoring position, the court concluded, was unreasonable, as that position is rotating and temporary, and the ADA does not require converting a temporary position to a permanent one for the sake of accommodating a disability.
By David E. Worley
In Hall v. Village of Flossmoor Police Department (116 FEP Cases 1209), an Illinois Federal Court threw out the lawsuit of a School Liaison officer who was fired after an admitted sexual relationship with an 18 year-old, recently graduated student. The officer ultimately admitted that it occurred and had included sex in the Department vehicle. The court determined his claim that his race played a role in the termination could not survive summary judgment when the evidence of misconduct was so apparent. [Read more…]
