By Anthony Rice

In City of Marengo, Arbitrator Stanley Kravit found the termination of a police officer to be without just cause when the City improperly ordered the officer to return to work while she was recovering from an injury. Kravit rejected the City’s claim that it was “insubordination” to refuse to return to work once the City’s hired physician found her fit when this finding was against the weight of the evidence that she was, in fact,  unable to safely work.  Kravitt ruled that the City violated the due process requirement—that all relevant evidence be fairly considered before discharge. [Read more…]

By Anthony Rice

In Carlton County, the Union failed to prove its claim of a past practice in the Minnesota Sheriff’s Department of pairing one of the four most senior field deputies, with one of the four least senior field deputies when shift assignments are made. The County therefore did not violate the CBA when it paired the Grievant, one of the four most senior deputies, as the junior deputy to another of the four most senior deputies.

[Read more…]

By Mitchel Wilson

In City of Inkster, 131 LA 1179 (Brodsky, 2013), Arbitrator Deborah Brodsky concluded that the Michigan City violated the CBA when it deducted the pro rata remainder of equipment allowances paid to officers in a lump sum at the start of the year.  The deduction was improper because the CBA only allows for the deduction when an officer is “terminated” but in this case, the officers were laid off and subject to return.  

[Read more…]