By Mitchel Wilson
In Bell v. City of Harvey, the district court suspended the City’s motion for summary judgment and granted Police Sergeant Andrew Bell more time to present evidence to substantiate his claims of five instances of retaliation for filing an age discrimination claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).
By Anthony Rice
In Haverda v. Hays County, an the Federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found Texas Corrections Captain Haverda introduced enough evidence that could lead a reasonable juror to conclude Haverda’s demotion was motivated by his speech. It rejected a lower court ruling that had dismissed Haverda’s claim and sent it back for trial.
By David Worley
In Stokes v. Dallas County Juvenile Dep’t, 20, WH Cases 2d 327 (5th Cir. 2013) the Fifth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals upheld summary judgment on retaliation claims under both Title VII and the FMLA when the plaintiff could indicate no connection between her termination and the activities protected by both those statutes. Further the employer provided substantial evidence supporting the termination of the plaintiff, including numerous instances of poor performance that resulted in discipline. Although the plaintiff could make a prima facie case regarding the FMLA claim (but not the Title VII claim), the court nevertheless found summary judgement was proper when no reasonable person could find that discrimination had occurred. [Read more…]
By Anthony Rice
In Peele v. Burch, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision granting summary judgment to the City on a detective’s First Amendment Claim against the Portage Indiana Police Department. The court held that the detective presented sufficient evidence that casts doubt on the defendants’ story and thus creates a triable claim.
By Anthony Rice
In Cuyahoga County Sheriff’s Office, the arbitrator found there was just cause for firing an off duty police officer who fired warning shots during a domestic dispute with her ex-boyfriend. Arbitrator Joseph D’Eletto rejected the claim of the Ohio Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association that her acquittal in Cleveland municipal court on an unlawful discharge charge barred Department discipline. The Arbitrator also sustained the Department charge that she had been untruthful when she described the precursor to the shots to be a “struggle” where no physical contact had actually occurred.
By Mitchel Wilson
In Ellins v. City of Sierra Madre, 35 IER Cases 432 (2013), the Ninth Court of Appeals remanded a case against the City of Sierre Madre for trial because the trial court dismissed it after it incorrectly concluded that Officer John Ellins did not qualify for first amendment protections.
By Anthony Rice
Ohio Patrolmen’s Benevolent Ass’n v. City of Trenton, the Court of Appeals of Ohio upheld an arbitration award ordering the “involuntary resignation” of a police sergeant. The unusual case led to an unusual remedy which the union then unsuccessfully sought to have set aside in court. [Read more…]
By Anthony Rice
In Bonenberger v. St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, Plaintiff David Bonenberger, who is white, claims that two lieutenants conspired to promote another candidate over him based on her race. On summary judgment, the court viewed the evidence in a light most favorable to Bonenberger and found that a jury could reasonably conclude two lieutenants conspired against him, and therefore concluded the case could go to trial.
By Mitchel Wilson
The Federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Montone v. City of Jersey City, reversed the District Court and allowed Officer Valerie Montone and male co-plaintiffs to bring political retaliation/first amendment claims to trial when the City froze all promotions to lieutenant despite a lieutenant shortage. The court concluded that a group of male co-plaintiffs eligible for promotion also had valid claims, even though they weren’t the direct target of the alleged misconduct. [Read more…]
By Anthony Rice
I
n City of Marengo, Arbitrator Stanley Kravit found the termination of a police officer to be without just cause when the City improperly ordered the officer to return to work while she was recovering from an injury. Kravit rejected the City’s claim that it was “insubordination” to refuse to return to work once the City’s hired physician found her fit when this finding was against the weight of the evidence that she was, in fact, unable to safely work. Kravitt ruled that the City violated the due process requirement—that all relevant evidence be fairly considered before discharge. [Read more…]
