By Anthony Rice
In Peele v. Burch, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision granting summary judgment to the City on a detective’s First Amendment Claim against the Portage Indiana Police Department. The court held that the detective presented sufficient evidence that casts doubt on the defendants’ story and thus creates a triable claim.
By Anthony Rice
In Cuyahoga County Sheriff’s Office, the arbitrator found there was just cause for firing an off duty police officer who fired warning shots during a domestic dispute with her ex-boyfriend. Arbitrator Joseph D’Eletto rejected the claim of the Ohio Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association that her acquittal in Cleveland municipal court on an unlawful discharge charge barred Department discipline. The Arbitrator also sustained the Department charge that she had been untruthful when she described the precursor to the shots to be a “struggle” where no physical contact had actually occurred.
By Mitchel Wilson
In Ellins v. City of Sierra Madre, 35 IER Cases 432 (2013), the Ninth Court of Appeals remanded a case against the City of Sierre Madre for trial because the trial court dismissed it after it incorrectly concluded that Officer John Ellins did not qualify for first amendment protections.
By Anthony Rice
Ohio Patrolmen’s Benevolent Ass’n v. City of Trenton, the Court of Appeals of Ohio upheld an arbitration award ordering the “involuntary resignation” of a police sergeant. The unusual case led to an unusual remedy which the union then unsuccessfully sought to have set aside in court. [Read more…]
By Anthony Rice
In Bonenberger v. St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, Plaintiff David Bonenberger, who is white, claims that two lieutenants conspired to promote another candidate over him based on her race. On summary judgment, the court viewed the evidence in a light most favorable to Bonenberger and found that a jury could reasonably conclude two lieutenants conspired against him, and therefore concluded the case could go to trial.
By Mitchel Wilson
The Federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Montone v. City of Jersey City, reversed the District Court and allowed Officer Valerie Montone and male co-plaintiffs to bring political retaliation/first amendment claims to trial when the City froze all promotions to lieutenant despite a lieutenant shortage. The court concluded that a group of male co-plaintiffs eligible for promotion also had valid claims, even though they weren’t the direct target of the alleged misconduct. [Read more…]
By Anthony Rice
I
n City of Marengo, Arbitrator Stanley Kravit found the termination of a police officer to be without just cause when the City improperly ordered the officer to return to work while she was recovering from an injury. Kravit rejected the City’s claim that it was “insubordination” to refuse to return to work once the City’s hired physician found her fit when this finding was against the weight of the evidence that she was, in fact, unable to safely work. Kravitt ruled that the City violated the due process requirement—that all relevant evidence be fairly considered before discharge. [Read more…]
By Anthony Rice
In Salvato v. Smith, the court denied the City’s motion to dismiss a female police officer’s harassment claim. The court found the Officer successfully alleged her superior officers’ behavior was “sufficiently severe or pervasive” enough to alter the conditions of her employment. The court found the Officer’s Complaint was brimming with allegations regarding the hostile conduct she suffered, including: [Read more…]
By Anthony Rice
In Carlton County, the Union failed to prove its claim of a past practice in the Minnesota Sheriff’s Department of pairing one of the four most senior field deputies, with one of the four least senior field deputies when shift assignments are made. The County therefore did not violate the CBA when it paired the Grievant, one of the four most senior deputies, as the junior deputy to another of the four most senior deputies.
By Mitchel Wilson
In Bridgeforth v. Jewell, the court granted the United States Park Service, summary judgment because police officer Wayne Bridgeforth’s claims of retaliation were too speculative for trial. The DC Circuit Court of Appeals found insufficient evidence linking the denial of Bridgeforth’s time off award with his “protected activity” of having filed a discrimination claim.
